Drone Ruling - USA

| Author: Darren Shelmerdine [Member (F/1004)] | Filed under: General News
Drone Ruling - USA

Calling the government's arguments "unpersuasive", the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit struck down a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) rule today requiring recreational drone users register their model aircraft with the federal government. This is a victory for the plaintiff John A. Taylor and other drone hobbyists. However, this ruling does not give a "pass" to investigative and security professionals utilizing UAS (Drones) for commercial purposes.

The court agreed with the plaintiff, a recreational drone pilot, who argued that the FAA doesn’t have the power to make him register his toy drones because Congress already said the FAA can’t regulate model aircraft. “The FAA’s 2015 registration rule, which applies to model aircraft, directly violates that clear statutory prohibition,” the opinion said. “We therefore grant Taylor’s petition and vacate the registration rule to the extent it applies to model aircraft.”

As drones increased in popularity and became more affordable, Congress and the FAA became increasingly concerned with drones entering into the national airspace. Congress directed the FAA to safely integrate drones into the national airspace in a 2012 aviation law. However, they included a special exemption for model aircraft.

In December 2015, the FAA issued an interim rule requiring drone hobbyists to register their recreational aircraft with the agency. The court called the registration process “quite extensive, as one would imagine for airplanes.”

The rule — which had not been formally finalized — required model aircraft owners to provide their name, email address and physical address; pay a $5 registration fee; and display a unique drone ID number at all times. Those who failed to comply could face civil and criminal penalties.

The appeals court cited the 2012 law in its ruling, saying that recreational drones count as model aircraft and arguing that that the FAA registration requirement constitutes a rule or regulation.

“Congress passed and President Obama signed the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012,” the ruling said. “Specifically, the ‘Special Rule for Model Aircraft’ [section] provides that the FAA ‘may not promulgate any rule or regulation regarding a model aircraft.’”

The FAA argued that the registration rule is not a new requirement, but a “decision to cease its exercise of enforcement discretion,” which falls within its mission to improve aviation safety. They contended that exempting some drones from the registration log would “create a gaping hole in FAA’s enforcement authority and threaten the safety of the national airspace system.”

Endorsed by the Law Society

The ABI is the only association in this industry to be endorsed by the Law Society of England and Wales, and included in the Law Society of Scotland's approved Supplier Scheme.

The highest independent professional bodies for solicitors put their trust in us. We’re confident you can do the same.

Law Society logo
Scotland Law Society logo